PENGARUH KECERDASAN NATURALIS DAN GAYA BELAJAR SISWA TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR IPA

Main Article Content

Winayanti Sobari

Abstract

This research is an ex-post facto experiment to find out: (1) Differences in science learning
outcomes between students who have Auditory (A1), Visual (A2) and kinesthetic learning
styles (A3), (2) Effect of Interactions between Naturalist Intelligence and Learning Style
towards Science Learning Outcomes (3) Naturalist intelligence can influence student
learning outcomes, (4) Differences in student learning outcomes with high Naturalist
intelligence (B1) with audiotory, visual and Kinesthetic learning styles (5) Differences in
student learning outcomes with low Naturalist intelligence (B2) with Auditory, Visual and
Kinesthetic learning styles. The method used is ex-post facto, with 3 x 2 factorial design and
samling random sampling and quota sampling techniques, obtained 20 sample students for
each learning style, so the sample size is 60 student. ANAVA calculation results, obtained
Fcount = 12. 767> Ftable = 3. 34 means that there are differences in science learning
outcomes for students who have auditory, visual and kinesthetic learning styles where
science learning outcomes between students who use visual learning styles are better than
students who use auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles. Interaction between learning
style with naturalist intelligence towards science learning outcomes with Fcount = 29, 644>
Ftable = 3, 34 so it was concluded that there was an effect of interaction between learning
style and naturalist intelligence on science learning outcomes. There are differences in
science learning outcomes for students who have high naturalist intelligence with low
naturalist intelligence, obtained t count> t table or 4, 391> 2, 048. Learning outcomes of
students who have high naturalist intelligence with a visual learning style higher than
students with style Auditory learning with an average difference of 3. 90 and students with
a kinesthetic learning style with an average difference of 2. 20 so that there is an interaction
between learning styles and naturalist intelligence on learning outcomes of science. A1B2
and A3B2 groups have significant differences with sig = 0, 000 <0, 050. This shows that there
are significant differences between science learning outcomes of students who have low
naturalist intelligence and auditory learning styles, with students with kinesthetic learning
styles.

Article Details

How to Cite
SOBARI, Winayanti. PENGARUH KECERDASAN NATURALIS DAN GAYA BELAJAR SISWA TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR IPA. PROSIDING SNTP, [S.l.], v. 1, dec. 2018. ISSN 2654-3192. Available at: <http://pkm.uika-bogor.ac.id/index.php/SNTP/article/view/249>. Date accessed: 21 june 2021.
Section
Articles